This past week in class we were asked to choose between Booker T. Washington's approach to African American equality and W. E. B. Du Bois's tactics. After reading both of their pieces in our anthology, I felt more inclined towards Washington's ideas. Although I think Washington's subtle approach as well as Du Bois' more aggressive methods were both essential in the process of African American equality, I connected more with Washington's humble character and his views on unity.
I think Washington recognized that equality wasn't something that was going to happen quickly. Although he wanted it just as much as any other African American, he was selfless in his understanding that he would probably only play a part in its long journey. Du Bois however, aggressively fought for African American equality and expected to see it happen in his lifetime. While he had every right to expect this, I don't think he was seeing things very realistically. From my experience with change, it is always painfully slow and never seams to happen they way we want it to. However, does this mean we should move along with the speed of change or fight against it hoping to quicken its pace? Would African American equality be where it is today if thinkers like Du Bois didn't fight hard for it for their own generation?
I agree with your assessment. I had a really hard time deciding with whom I agreed. I think that you have a valid point in saying that people needed to hear both sides of the argument. And in addition to that, I think that sometimes, an opposing party is very beneficial. It's important to have someone to argue with you and call you out on your fouls. Having someone else to debate with makes for a better outcome in the end. Good notes!
ReplyDelete